AFDX SNMP Get-Next Fix

From Deos
Jump to navigationJump to search


The project page will track all necessary activity associated with implementing the AFDX SNMP Get-Next fix. PCR 5252.

Description

SNMP GET-NEXT requests that are traversing the MIB tree in the area of AFDXRedundancy.VLPortIndex will return an incorrect 'next' port value when the 'next' port requires more than 2 bytes in the ASN notation.

Specific test case: A400M ISU configuration: SNMP GET-NEXT request for "enterprises.11348.1.1.3.2.1.1.1.15068" incorrectly returns "enterprises.11348.1.1.3.2.1.1.1.8466"

The correct 'next' port should be 24850 which would require 3 bytes in ASN. If you convert 24850 to ASN and forget to add the 3rd byte you will end up with port 8466, so this seems to indicate that there is a problem converting the larger port numbers to ASN.


News

  • 2009-01-26: Tom Taranowski updated SAS about this limitation.
  • 2009-02-25: ADIRU requests quote for this fix.


Searchable Mail List

Tasks

Initial Budget:

YTD:

Current ETC:

Current EAC:

Milestones Due Date Estimated Delivery Delivered Percentage Complete
Certification Candidate: Version 4.5.0 100%
Verification Complete 27-MAR-2007 26-APR-2007 26-APR-2007 100%
Analysis Complete Never* Never* 8%

*This analysis was not deemed necessary to meet any DO-178B objectives. Therefore, it was not/will not be performed.


Note: Unless noted otherwise, all estimates below are in terms of effort hours.

Infrastructure Update

Task Dependency Assignee Risk Original Estimate Current Estimate Elapsed Remaining


Certification Candidate

Task Dependency Assignee Risk Original Estimate Current Estimate Elapsed Remaining
2.1 Requirement Rework None 4 4 0 4
2.2 Code development 2.1 None 4 4 0 4
2.3 Ad-hoc Test development 2.1 None 16 16 0 16
2.4 Certification Candidate - Release 2.3 None 8 8 0 8
Totals 32 32 0 32

Verification

Task Dependency Assignee Risk Original Estimate Current Estimate Elapsed Remaining
3.1 Energize Review Status Files 2.4 None 8 8 0 8
3.2 Requirements review 2.1, 3.1 None 8 8 0 8
3.3 Test Case Development 2.1 None 16 16 0 16
3.4 Test Procedure Development 2.1, 2.3 None 24 24 0 24
3.6 Code review 3.2 None 8 8 0 8
3.7 Test Case Review 3.2, 3.3 None 8 8 0 8
3.8 Test Procedure Review 3.4, 3.7 None 16 16 0 16
3.9 Software life cycle audit 3.8 None 16 16 0 16
3.10 Requirements coverage analysis 3.6, 3.7 None 8 8 0 8
3.11 Conformity inspection - SQA build Witness 3.8, 3.10 l None 8 8 0 8
3.12 SCAT/ABC qualification 3.8 None 8 8 0 8
3.13 Integration review 3.11, 3.12 None 8 8 0 8
3.14 Run for score, including SQA witnessing, and test results review 3.13 None 8 8 0 8
3.15 Structural coverage analysis 3.14 None 8 8 0 8
3.16 Verification audit 3.15 None 16 16 0 16
3.17 Certification documents: SAS, SLCECI, SCI 3.15 None 40 40 0 40
3.18 Population of certification archive (PCA) 3.17 None 8 8 0 8
3.19 Software conformity audit 3.18 None 8 8 0 8
Totals 224 224 0 224

Review status summary

Analysis


Task Dependency Assignee Risk Original Estimate Current Estimate Elapsed Remaining
4.1 Analyze Implementation (per the above) 2.2 Larson 80 80 8 72
4.2 Document Discoveries 4.1 Larson 16 16 0 16
Totals 96 96 8 88

Risks

None currently.